SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 1723

HIMA KOHLI
FDC LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK BAHRI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms. Tanya Verma, Advocate.
Mr. Sanjay Agnihotri, Advocate.

ORDER

I.A. No.15076/2015 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)

1. The present joint application has been filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the suit proceedings, they have arrived at an out of court negotiated settlement.

2. The terms and conditions of the settlement have been recorded in paras 1 to 10 of the application, whereunder the defendants have given a series of undertakings to the plaintiff and in terms of the said undertakings, the plaintiff has agreed that it shall not press for the relief of damages and delivery up against the defendants.

3. Counsels for the parties jointly state that the suit may be decreed in terms of the settlement recorded in the present application.

4. The court has perused the present application. The same has been signed by the authorized signatories of the plaintiff and the defendant No.2 and the defendant No.1 and their respective counsels. The application is supported by the affidavits of the signatories to the application.

5. As the counsels for the plaintiff and the defendants jointly state that they have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coer





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top