BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rakesh Kumar Sachdeva – Appellant
Versus
Prem Arora – Respondent
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
1. This appeal arises out of order dated 15.04.2015 passed by a learned single judge of this court dismissing O.A. No. 128 of 2015 filed by the appellant. By the O.A. the appellant had impugned the order dated 09.02.2015 passed by the Joint Registrar closing the right of the appellant/plaintiff to lead evidence.
2. On 09.02.2015, the case was listed for further cross-examination of the PW-1. (The Plaintiff in the suit and appellant herein). The Joint Registrar noted that the PW-1 was not present. The counsel for the plaintiff had submitted that the plaintiff had taken away the file and he was not in contact. The counsel for the plaintiff had submitted that he intended to seek discharge. The Joint Registrar noted from the previous order sheets that PW-1 was not present on previous dates of hearing also and accordingly the plaintiff’s evidence was closed.
3. As is borne out from the impugned order, the Learned counsel for the appellant before the learned single judge in the appeal contended that the appellant did not appear before the joint registrar as he was in a state of shock as his mother had expired on 02nd January 2015.
4. The Learned single judge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.