SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3187

INDERMEET KAUR
BADARI MEHTO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate.
Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP

JUDGMENT

INDERMEET KAUR, J.


1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 05.7.2013 and 06.7.2013 respectively wherein the appellant stood convicted under Section 376 of the IPC. He has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/-,in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 15 days. Benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C. has been granted to the appellant.

2. Nominal roll of the appellant has been requisitioned. As on date the appellant has undergone 5 years of incarceration which includes the remissions earned by him. His jail conduct has been satisfactory.

3. The version of the prosecution was disclosed in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. which had formed the basis of the FIR and which was to the effect that at about 4.00 p.m. in the afternoon on 26.4.2011 while she was playing outside her house the accused who was known to her had taken her to a poultry farm where, in a room he had committed rape upon her. She informed her father pursuant to which the present FIR had been registered. The victim was medically examined and her MLC was proved as Ex.PW-1/A. Statement of




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top