INDERMEET KAUR
AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 07.02.2012 and 14.02.2012 respectively wherein the appellant stands convicted under Section 21-C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’). He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3 lacs and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for a period of one year.
2. The nominal roll of the appellant reflects that as on date, he has undergone incarceration of 5 years and 9 months; remission being inapplicable to a convict under the said Act. Fine has not been paid.
3. The version of the prosecution is that on 29.12.2009 at about 05:30 pm near the Shastri Park Majar, the accused was found to be in illegal possession of 270 gms of heroin; this contained 1% diacetylmorphine which was the unlawful contraband. This recovery had been effected pursuant to a secret information which had been recorded in the police station. A raiding party had been constituted comprising of constable Satpal (PW-3), HC Mahesh (PW-11) and SI Bhagwan Singh (PW-12). Before search of the accused had been ef
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.