INDERMEET KAUR
SUMIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 23.08.2013 & 26.08.2013 respectively wherein the appellant Deep Singh stands convicted under Section 397 read with Sections 32/43 of the IPC. Maximum sentence awarded to him is RI 7years for his conviction under Section 397 of the IPC. For his second conviction, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 6 months. Nominal roll of the appellant reflects that as on date, he has undergone incarceration of 3 years and 10 months. The second convict Sumit has been convicted under Section 392/34 of the IPC. He has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 6 months. His nominal roll has been requisitioned. This reflects that as on date, he has undergone incarceration of 3 years.
2. The version of the prosecution was unfolded in the testimony of the complainant Rashik (PW-4). His version was to the effect that he is a resident of A Block, Sonia Vihar, Delhi. He was working as a bar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.