SURESH KAIT, J.

1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’) has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.08.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, thereby the police was directed to make further investigation of the case. Further seeks directions thereby quashing the FIR No.55/2002 registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 380/457/448/506/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘IPC’) and emanating proceedings thereto.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 22.10.1946, father of the petitioner Late Sh. Narender Nath Sharma had filed a suit for partition and separate possession in respect of the property bearing Municipal No.476-A, measuring 280 square yards, situated at Teliwara, Shahdara, Delhi, against late Sh. Jagdish Saran and Others, in the court of Senior Subordinate Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi, which was registered as Suit No.76/596/1937 of 1946/1952. Accordingly, on 25.08.1952, the learned Sub-Judge, First Class, Delhi, decreed the suit of petitioner’s father titled as “Narender Nath & Anr. Vs. Jagdish Saran & Others” and passed the judgment and a preliminary decree for partition and possession in respect of the suit property entitling petitioners therein to 140 square yards out of 280 square yards suit land in favour of the then petitioners and against the then defendants.

3. On 28.03.1960, the Division Bench of the Punjab High Court, Circuit Bench, Delhi, also dismissed the appeal bearing RFA No.61-D/1952 filed by the aforesaid defendants. On 04.09.1967, the Full Bench of the Supreme Court also dismissed the appeal bearing Civil Appeal No.9/1965 with costs thereby confirming the judgment and preliminary decree dated 25.08.1952 passed by the learned Trial Court, Tis Hazari, Delhi. On 29.07.1985, the petitioner alongwith his brothers and sisters filed an application under Section 20 Rule 18 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘CPC’) for making the final decree in the aforesaid suit and the same is pending disposal before the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

4. The petitioner, who is appearing in person, submitted that on 14.03.2002, the complainant/respondent No.2 filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in the court of learned ACMM, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, against him and his family members.

5. After investigation, the police filed the closure report on 23.10.2002 on the ground that the case was found to be false and fabricated. The said report was not accepted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and accordingly vide order dated 03.04.2003, notice was issued to the complainant. On 07.06.2004, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate accepted the cancellation report and the case was fixed for respondent No.2/complainant’s evidence and thereafter from 07.06.2004 to 25.08.2004, the evidence was not recorded rather the case kept pending without any legal justification.

6. Being aggrieved, petitioner filed Crl. M.C. No.1729/2014 before this Court. The same was disposed of vide order dated 15.04.2014 by directing the learned Trial Court to take notice of order dated 07.06.2004 and promptly proceed with the matter and make all endeavour to conclude the proceedings before the learned Trial Court within a period of six months from the date of hearing already fixed i.e., 15.05.2014.

7. The petitioner further submitted that on 07.08.2014, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, instead of complying with the order dated 15.04.2014 passed by this Court, ordered for further investigation to be conducted by the police which is against the provisions of law and in complete disregard to the aforesaid order. Hence, the petitioner approached this Court by way of the present petition.

8. He submitted that the impugned order of