SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3038

RAJIV SHAKDHER
NAIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
O P KAIM – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. RFA 867/2015

2. This is an appeal filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2015. The trial court has, by virtue of the impugned judgment and order, allowed the respondent/defendant’s application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the CPC).

2.1 The short ground on which the trial court has allowed the aforementioned application is that the limitation period prescribed under Article 75 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short the 1963 Act) had expired.

2.2 To be noted, the appellant / plaintiff had filed a suit for defamation against the respondent/ defendant. The suit for defamation was based on the respondent / defendant’s letters dated 08.06.2013 and 12.07.2013 addressed to the one, Mr. Vinay Kaushik, who was appointed, at the relevant point in time, as the Returning Officer. According to the appellant / plaintiff, the assertions made in the said letters were defamatory.

2.3 The suit in this case, based on the contents of the aforementioned letters of the respondent/ defendant, was instituted on 05.03.2015.

2.4 It is not disputed before me by the learned counsel for the appellant / plaintiff,







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top