2015 Supreme(Del) 3111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
In the matter of : Lloyds Line Pipes Limited
Company Application (Main) No. 189/2015
Decided on : 23-12-2015
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Ashutosh Gupta
The main legal point established is the court's authority to dispense with certain shareholder and creditor meetings and exempt the transferee company from separate proceedings under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 based on the nature of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement.
Headnote:
Companies Act - Scheme of Arrangement - Sections 391, 392 & 394 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed Sections 391, 392, and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 along with Rules 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The court highlighted the exemption granted to the transferee company from separate proceedings under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, based on settled legal position and the nature of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought directions to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors and to convene a meeting of unsecured creditors to consider and approve a proposed Scheme of Arrangement between two companies.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the application, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors, and directed the convening of a meeting of unsecured creditors. The court also dispensed with the requirement for the transferee company to approach the court for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
Issues: Dispensation of shareholder and creditor meetings, approval of Scheme of Arrangement, and exemption from separate proceedings for the transferee company.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the consents/no objections from shareholders and secured creditors, the proposed amalgamation's contribution to business objectives, and the exemption granted to the transferee company from separate proceedings under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Final Decision: The application was allowed, dispensing with certain shareholder and creditor meetings and exempting the transferee company from separate proceedings for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
Sudershan Kumar Misra, J.
1. This application has been filed under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by the applicant/transferor company seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders and secured creditors and for convening a meeting of its unsecured creditors to consider and approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of Arrangement between Lloyds Line Pipes Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) and APL Apollo Tubes Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company.
2. The registered offices of the applicant/transferor company and the transferee company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The applicant/transferor company was originally incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 on 4th September, 2008 with the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra at Mumbai. The company shifted its registered office from the State of Maharashtra to Delhi and obtained a certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi 26th August, 2011.
4. The present authorized share capital of the applicant/transferor company is Rs.20,00,00,000/- divided into 2,00,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is Rs.20,00,00,000/- divided into 2,00,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
5. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record. The audited balance sheet, as on 31st March, 2015, along with the report of the auditors, of the applicant/transferor company has also been filed.
6. A copy of the Scheme of Arrangement has been placed on record and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and detailed in the application and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by the pplicant that the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company. It is claimed that the proposed amalgamation will contribute in furthering and fulfilling the objectives and business strategies of both the companies thereby accelerating growth, expansion and development of their business. It is further claimed that the proposed amalgamation will lead to optimum and efficient utilization of capital, resources, assets and facilities; enhancement of competitive strengths including financial resources; and will result in reduction of overheads, administrative, managerial and other expenditure and bring about operational rationalization, efficiency and optimum utilization of various resources.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme provides that the entire share capital of the transferor company is held by the transferee company. Therefore, the transferee company shall not be required to issue any shares or pay any consideration to the transferor company or to their shareholders.
8. It has been submitted by the applicant that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 and corresponding provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 are pending against the applicant/ transferor company.
9. The Board of Directors of the applicant/transferor company and the transferee company in their separate meetings held on 13th June, 2015 have unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. Copies of the Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the applicant/transferor company and the transferee company have been placed on record.
10. The applicant/transferor company has 07 equity shareholders and 02 secured creditors. All the equity shareholders and both the secured creditors have given their consents/no objections in writing to the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. Their consents/no objections have been placed on record. They have been examined and found in order. In view thereof, the requirement of co