SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 256

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA, JJ.
M/s N. Kumar Associates International - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
WP(C) No.1682/2015 & 17914/2015 (u/s 8 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act), CM Nos.3028/2015 (stay)
Decided on : 15.01.2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sagar Dhama, Mr. Kshitiz Ahuja
For the Respondent: Mr. Amitara Poddar

The computation of time as per the General Clauses Act, 1897 can be used to determine the validity of submissions in contractual matters.

Headnote:

Performance Guarantee - Contract Termination - General Clauses Act, 1897 - [House Keeping of Yamuna Rest House, Rail Niwas, Annexe Yamuna & ORH near Rail Club in the section of SSE/W/Transit Camp under ADEN/E-II] - [General Clauses Act, 1897, Clause 10] - The court discussed the tender condition regarding the submission of the performance guarantee and the computation of time as per the General Clauses Act, 1897. The court found that the termination of the contract was not in order as the performance guarantee was submitted within the allowable time. The court also ordered the return of the earnest money deposit and set aside the debarment order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner participated in a tender for housekeeping work. The contract was terminated due to the petitioner's failure to submit the performance guarantee within the stipulated period.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the termination of the contract was not in order as the performance guarantee was submitted within the allowable time. The court ordered the return of the earnest money deposit and set aside the debarment order.

Issues: Contract termination, submission of performance guarantee, forfeiture of earnest money deposit, debarment from future tenders.

Ratio Decidendi: The computation of time as per the General Clauses Act, 1897 was applied to determine the validity of the performance guarantee submission. The court held that the termination of the contract was not justified.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, ordered the return of the earnest money deposit with interest, and set aside the debarment order.

JUDGMENT :

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.

1. The petitioner had participated in tender No.79/14-15 dated 18.07.2014 for the work “House Keeping of Yamuna Rest House, Rail Niwas, Annexe Yamuna & ORH near Rail Club in the section of SSE/W/Transit Camp under ADEN/E-II”. The petitioner’s bid was accepted by the competent authority. The petitioner had made, inter alia, an earnest money deposit of Rs1.80 lakhs alongwith the tender and the same was retained as security money of the work. A letter of acceptance was issued to the petitioner by the competent authority of the Northern Railways on 12.08.2014. It was indicated in the letter of acceptance that the contract value of the work would be Rs. 66,34,505.04 and that the performance guarantee amounting to Rs. 3,31,730/- was required to be deposited within 30 days failing which penal interest @ 15% per annum would be charged as per tender condition No.5.2.1(a). The said tender condition No.5.2.1(a) reads as under:-

“5.2 Performance Guarantee:

5.2.1 The procedure for obtaining Performance Guarantee is outlined below:

(a) The successful bidder shall have to submit a Performance Guarantee (PG) within 30 (Thirty) days from the date of issue of letter of Acceptance (LOA). Extention of time for submission of PG beyond 30(Thirty) days and upto 60 days from the date of issue of LOA may be given by the Authority who is competent to sign the contract agreement. However, a penal interest of 15% per annum shall be charged for the delay beyond (Thirty) days, i.e. from 31st day after the date of issue of LOA. In case the contractor fails to submit the requisite PG even after 60 days from the date of issue of LOA, the contract shall be terminated duly forfeiting EMD and other dues, if any payable against that contract. The failed contractor shall be debarred from the participating in re-tender for that work.

(b) xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

2. The petitioner did not deposit the performance guarantee within the initial period of 30 days stipulated in the said tender condition. However, the petitioner deposited the performance guarantee alongwith interest @ 15% per annum on 13.10.2014. The respondent thereupon issued a letter dated 23.12.2014 terminating the contract and forfeiting the earnest money of Rs1.80 lakhs. The respondent also debarred the petitioner from participating in future tenders for the subject work. The petitioner is aggrieved by the said letter dated 23.12.2014.

3. The impugned letter dated 23.12.2014 is set out hereinbelow:-

“NORTHERN RAILWAY DRM OFFICE NEW DELHI

128-W/269/79/14-15/WE

Dated: 23.12.2014

M/s. N. Kumar Associates International, Starlink Navalkunj Building, Linking Road (Bandra), Mumbai-400050

Sub:- House Keeping of Yamuna Rest House, Rail Niwas, Annexe Yamuna & ORH near Rail Club in the section of SSE/W/Transit Camp under ADEN/E-II.

Ref:- Acceptance letter of even no. dated 12.08.2014.

Dear Sir,

The contract for the above mentioned work has awarded to you vide this office acceptance letter of even no. dated 12.08.2014. As per tender condition No.5.2.1(a) you were required to deposit P.G.@ 5% of contract value amounting to Rs.3,31,730/- positively within 30 days from the date of issue of acceptance letter failing which interest @ 15% p.a. was leviable from 31st days to 60 days i.e. upto 10.10.2014.

As per tender condition No.5.2.1

(a) The successful bidder shall have to submit a Performance Guarantee (PG) within 30 (Thirty) days from the date of issue of letter of Acceptance (LOA). Extension of time for submission of PG beyond 30(Thirty) days and upto 60 days from the date of issue of LOA may be given by the Authority who is competent to sign the contract agreement. However, a penal interest of 15% per annum shall be charged for the delay beyond (Thirty) days, i.e. from 31st day after the date of issue of LOA. In case the contractor fails to submit the requisite PG even after 60 days from the date of issue of LOA, the contract shall be terminated duly forfeiting EMD and other dues, if any payable again













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top