SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 641

P.S.TEJI
POONAM KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. P.K. Anand, Advocate.
Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Ms. Poonam Kohli for quashing of FIR No. 96 of 2013 dated 06.03.2008, under Sections 452/427/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Samaipur Badli on the basis of the Joint Statement of the petitioner and the respondent No. 2, namely, Mr. Ramesh Gupta on 26.11.2012.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submitted that the respondent nos. 2, present in the Court has been identified to be the First-informant/ Complainant in the FIR in question by his counsel.

3. The factual matrix of this present case is that the FIR in question was lodged by the complainant, namely, Harmugam on the allegation that on 13.05.2013, he along with his friend Hira Lal s/o Lakshman Ram were going to the RML hospital. When they were crossing the road, while the complainant was stopping the traffic with his hand signals, a driver-petitioner hit the friend of the complainant i.e. Hira Lal as he was driving rashly with great speed. Hira Lal suffered injuries on his leg and backbone. Thereafter, the family of the petitioner started putting pressure on Hira Lal and his fami























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top