SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 425

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG & MUKTA GUPTA, JJ.
M/s Ridgeview Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
M/s Skyhigh Properties Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
FAO(OS) Nos.391/2015, 392/2015, 452/2015 & 395/2015
Decided on : 28.01.2016

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms. Ashna Abrol and Ms. Deepika Shrivastav, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr. Somesh Arora, Mr. Gulshan Sharma and Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advocates.

Headnote:

Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 22, Article 54 - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11 - Commercial building - Agreement to Sell - A joint Purchase Agreement - Perpetual-lease - Specific performance - Petition relates to specific performance of the contract by execution of the sale deed - Claimant has paid in respect of four flats Rs.15,48,97,040/- out of total sale consideration of Rs.16,86,21,300/- - Remaining amount is to be paid at the time of execution of the sale deeds - Conversion charges have also been paid by the Claimant - Amount has neither been deposited by the Respondent with the DDA nor the Respondent had applied for conversion of the plot into free-hold property - Held, Ridgeview having not performed its part of the obligation - Date fixed for performance had not arrived - Suit for specific performance of the agreement could not be held to be barred by limitation - Respondent was in breach of its obligation under the Agreement to Sell - No specific performance of the agreement could have been directed by the Arbitrator in view of its failure to pay the ground rent - Both the Arbitrator and the Single Judge strike the same chord - It was the obligation of the appellant to pay the ground rent and not that of the predecessors-in-interest of the respondents - Appeals are dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. Brief background of the matter is that M/s Ridgeview Construction Pvt. Ltd. the appellant No.1 herein (in short “Ridgeview”) on allotment of property bearing No.D-2, Saket District Centre, Saket Place, Saket, New Delhi by DDA on a perpetual-lease-hold tenure raised commercial building known as “Southern Park”. A joint Purchase Agreement was entered into between M/s South Lake Properties Pvt. Ltd. (in short “South Lake”), M/s Pushp Vihar Properties Pvt. Ltd. (in short “Pushp Vihar”), M/s Koshika Properties Pvt. Ltd. (in short “Koshika”) and M/s Wales Properties Pvt. Ltd., (in short “Wales”) with Ridgeview for purchase of the entire 5th floor of the said commercial property. Thus Joint Purchase Agreement dated February 09, 2005 was executed between Ridgeview and the predecessors-in-interest of the respondent Skyhigh Properties Ltd. (in short “Skyhigh”) i.e. South Lake, Pushp Vihar, Koshika and Wales. Further a bifurcation agreement was executed amongst the four predecessors-in-interest of Skyhigh on March 06, 2006 whereafter by virtue of agreement to sell dated April 16, 2007 Ridgeview agreed to sell office space of 5th floor of Southern Park having a total gross area of 9235.96 sq.ft. along with proportionate 4.76% undivided, indivisible and impartible share in and underneath the land to the predecessors-in-interest of the respondent. In terms of the Agreement to Sell dated April 16, 2007 it was agreed that Ridgeview shall have the lease-hold tenure converted into free-hold within three months of the date of the said Agreement to Sell subject to South Lake, Koshika, Pushp Vihar and Wales bearing the conversion charges on pro-rata basis inspite of the premises purchased by it. Relevant clause of the Agreements to Sell being para CC(v) reads as under:

“(v) As per the present guidelines of the DDA, it is permissible to have lease-hold rights in the said Commercial Plot converted into Free-hold and that there is no impediment or bar in this regard and the FIRST PARTY shall have its lease-hold rights in the said Commercial Plot converted into Free-hold within 3 (Three) months from the date of this Agreement provided that the SECOND PARTY bears the conversion charges on pro-rata basis in respect of the PREMISES. The FIRST PARTY shall be responsible for ensuring that the conversion charges are paid on pro-rata basis by all the other buyers/owners /occupants of all the portions of the said Commercial Building (viz. “SOUTHERN PARK”) other than the PREMISES and in case of non-payment of pro-rata conversion charges by any of such other buyers/ owners/ occupants, the FIRST PARTY shall itself pay the same without any delay and ensure that its lease-hold rights in the said Commercial Plot are converted into within 3 (Three) months from the date of this Agreement.”

2. Further Clause 30 of the Agreement to Sell dated April 16, 2007 provided-

“....30. The parties to this Agreement understand that this is an agreement for the purchase of constructed floor space i.e., the PREMISES and that the FIRST PARTY hereby makes the unconditional commitment in all events to execute and register the sale deed in respect of the PREMISES as provided for hereinabove in favour of the SECOND PARTY or its nominees within 3(Three) months from the date of this Agreement and after getting the lease-hold rights in respect of the said commercial Plot converted into free-hold and also on payment of conversion charges by the SECOND PARTY on pro-rata basis in respect of the PREMISES......”

3. In terms of the Agreement to Sell the following payments were made to Ridgeview: -

Name of the company

Office space agreed to be sold (sq.fts.)

Total consideration (Rs.)

Amount Paid (Rs.)

Amount to be paid at the time of execution of the sale deed (Rs.)

Amount paid for conversion of the property to free-hold (Rs.)

M/s Wales









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top