SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 2413

SUNIL GAUR
Narang Distillery Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Jaiswal – Respondent


For the Appellant :Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocates, For the Respondent:Mr. J.M. Kalia, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sunil Gaur, J.

1. Impugned judgment/decree of 25th August, 2009 mandates the Appellant to pay an amount of Rs. 18,64,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum to the Respondent, who was the Selling Agent of the Appellant Company by virtue of Agreement of 22nd May, 2007.

2. In terms of the aforesaid Agreement (Ex.P-1), Respondent had made a security deposit of Rs. 5 lac, which was to earn interest @ 9% per annum and Respondent was to get commission @ Rs. 80/- per case/box of country liquor and against prior payment, consignments of the liquor was supplied by the Appellant to the Respondent vide Challan/Invoices (Ex.PW-1/2 to Ex.PW-1/13). In addition, the Respondent is said to have deposited a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/- in cash and another amount of Rs. 2,16,000/- by way of a Pay Order (Ex.PW-1/14) with the Appellant on 7th June, 2007 and again on 6th July, 2007, Respondent claims to have paid Rs. 1 lac by cheque to the Appellant.

3. According to the Respondent, aforesaid payments were made in terms of the afore-referred Agreement but the Appellant had failed to supply the liquor against the payments made and thus, the Agreement between the parties stood frustrated and cancelled. As


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top