A.K.PATHAK
Sonu @ Chhotu – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi – Respondent
A.K.Pathak, J.
1. Both the above noted appeals arise out of the same incident, FIR and judgment, thus, are being disposed of together.
2. Trial court has convicted the appellants under Sections 392/394 read with Section 34 IPC. Appellant Hori Lal has been convicted under Section 397 IPC also. Appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 392 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. Appellant Hori Lal has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 397 IPC.
3. Aggrieved by their conviction as also the sentences, as awarded by the trial court, appellants have preferred above said appeals.
4. Prosecution story, as emerges from the record, is that on 12th October, 2008 complainant Babu Lal Mishra S/o Radhy Shyam (PW 4) alongwith eye witness Babu Lal Pal S/o Beche Lal Pal (PW 8) was carrying on three bundles of jeans on a cycle rickshaw from Shastri Park to the factory of their owner, in the evening. At about 8.30 pm when they reached near Shahdara Flyover, G.T.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.