V.K.SHALI
Sarita Dode – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
V.K. Shali, J. (ORAL);—
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying therein for quashing of order dated 14.8.2012 by virtue of which she has been summoned in Complaint Case No.10/1/12, registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri to face the trial for an offence under Section 420/380/34 IPC.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the impugned order. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no case under Section 380 or 420 IPC is made out warranting the summoning of the petitioner. In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the court to the impugned order and the documents filed along with the petition.
3. I have carefully considered the submissions. The respondent No.2 filed a complaint case against the petitioner. It was alleged in the complaint that the complainant, Suraj Bharti, was a permanent resident of Khasra No.67, Village Sahurpur, near Chadanhola Bus Stop, New Delhi-110074. He met accused No.1, Sarita Dode, the present petitioner, in the office of Davish Group in the month of April, 2011, where she was working as a receptionist. The s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.