Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. By the present common decision the above-captioned appeals are being disposed of. Since FAO(OS) No.253/1998 and RFA(OS) No.4/1999 are being allowed, learned counsel for the appellant states that FAO(OS) No.585/2006 may be dismissed as not pressed.

2. Accordingly, we record at the outset that FAO(OS) No.585/2006 is dismissed as not pressed.

3. We now proceed to deal with FAO(OS) No.253/1998 and RFA(OS) No.4/1999.

4. FAO(OS) No.253/1998 and RFA(OS) No.4/1999 have been preferred against a common judgment dated 17th July, 1998 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing Probate Petition No.32/1984 filed by the deceased appellant seeking probate of the Will dated February 21, 1983 and the codicil dated November 11, 1983 executed by late Faqir Chand Vadhera and allowing CS(OS) No.1239/1985 filed by the respondents; granting a decree for rendition of accounts as also a decree for permanent injunction prayed for by the respondents against the deceased appellant.

5. Rendition of Accounts was sought for by the respondents pertaining to the business of “Tilak Hosiery” conducted from Shop No.2-B Connaught Place, New Delhi on the plea that their late father Faqir