SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 2519

P.K.BHASIN
Harcharan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Brijesh Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

P.K. Bhasin, J.

The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner-tenant under section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act against the impugned order dated 22.11.2010 passed by Additional Rent Controller whereby the application filed by him under Section 25(5) seeking leave to contest the eviction petition filed against him by his landlords, respondents herein, in respect of one shop bearing no. 10274 ,Library Road, Azad Market, Delhi(hereinafter referred to be as tenanted shop) had been dismissed and consequently eviction order was been passed against him.

2. The relevant averments made in para no.18 (a) of the eviction petition on the basis of which eviction of the petitioner-tenant was sought by the respondents are re-produced below:-

“The petitioners are the owners of the shop no. 10274, Library Road, Azad Market, Delhi . The said premises were let out for commercial purposes and the same is required bonafidely by the petitioners for themselves and for their brother who have no suitable premises to do the business. The petitioner no.1 is aged 35 years is married having wife and a child, aged about 9 years, school going, and his mother too, petitioner Dheeraj Sahu i










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top