D.MURUGESAN, V.K.JAIN
N. D. M. C. – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Khanna – Respondent
V.K. Jain, J.;—
1. The respondent before us is assessed to property tax in the record of the appellant in respect of property No. 9, Jor Bagh, New Delhi. With effect from 01.06.1995, the respondent permitted M/s Bharti Cellular Ltd. to install a cellular antenna on the terrace of the aforesaid property at the rent of Rs 36,000/- per month. A notice, purporting to be under Section 77 of NDMC Act was issued by the appellant to the respondent on 15.12.1998, asking him to provide the following information:-
“10. Occupancy and rent (Portion-wise) with documents proof.
11. Similar information as given in Sr. No. 3 to 7 above in respect of addition alterations proposed/carried out in the premises from time to time.”
Vide reply dated 21.12.1998, the respondent stated that property No. 9, Jor Bagh, New Delhi, was self-occupied property and there had been no addition or alternation in the said property. A notice under Section 77 of NDMC Act was also sent to the respondent on 21.07.1999 which was replied by the respondent on 18.08.1999. It was stated in the reply that the status of the property had not been changed, it was a self-acquired property, was used for residential purpose only
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.