SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1973

VEENA BIRBAL
Ram Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ritesh Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr.Manish Kapoor, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT :

Veena Birbal, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.02.2013 passed by ld. Trial Court whereby the application of the petitioner, that is, defendant before the trial court under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. The respondent herein that is plaintiff before the trial court has filed a suit alleging therein that the petitioner/defendant was engaged as Chowkidar by one of the co-owners on monthly charges of Rs. 2500/- and in that capacity she was allowed to reside in the property. It is alleged that after 31.12.2006 there was no requirement of keeping any chowkidar and as such her services were terminated and she was required to hand over the possession of the flat, however, she became dishonest and did not hand over the flat and as such she is in unauthorised possession of the same. It is stated that the suit property was sold by the co-owners to the plaintiff by registered sale deed. Thereupon, notice was issued to her but she is not vacating the suit property, accordingly, the aforesaid suit has been filed.

3. The petitioner/defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC contending therein that the correct










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top