SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 2053

DELHI HIGH COURT
Pradeep Nandrajog, Pratibha Rani, JJ.
Raj Kumar Jha - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Resopndent
W.P. (C) 2683/2012 and W.P.(C) 7710 of 2012
Decided On : 22-04-2013

For the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 2683/2012:Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr. Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms. Saahila Lamba, Ms. Tinu Bajwa , Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocates.
For the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 7710 of 2012:Mr. R.V. Sinha , Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocates.
For the Respondents No. 1 , 2 in W.P.(C) 2683/2012:Mr. Rajinder Nishal, , Mr. Ashish Nischal, Advocates.
For the UPSC in W.P.(C) 2683/2012 , W.P.(C) 7710 of 2012 :Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta , Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates.
For the Respondent No. 1 in W.P.(C) 7710 of 2012:Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr. Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms. Saahila Lamba, Ms. Tinu Bajwa , Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocates.

A junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior.

Headnote:

INDIAN POLICE SERVICE - APPOINTMENT BY PROMOTION - FIXATION OF SENIORITY - IPS (REGULATION OF SENIORITY) RULES, 1988 - RULE 3(II)(A) AND (B) - IPS (APPOINTMENT BY PROMOTION) REGULATIONS, 1955 - REGULATION 7(4) - IPS (PAY) RULES, 2007 - RULE 5(3) AND SCHEDULE I - AMENDMENTS - ANOMALY - SENIORITY AND PAY FIXATION - WRIT PETITION - DIRECTIONS.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an officer of the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Police Service (DANIPS), challenged the fixation of his seniority upon induction into the Indian Police Service (IPS) as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, which resulted in him being placed below directly recruited IPS officers drawing lower pay scales and grade pay. The petitioner contended that this was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was indeed an anomaly in the application of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, which resulted in officers of the State Police Service being placed below directly recruited IPS officers drawing lower pay scales and grade pay. The court held that this was contrary to the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior, as established in the report of the 6th Central Pay Commission and the decision of the Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh Grewal v. Punjab State Electricity Board.

Issues: 1. Whether the fixation of seniority of the petitioner upon induction into the IPS as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior? 2. Whether the court could direct the amendment of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the fixation of seniority of the petitioner upon induction into the IPS as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior. The court relied on the report of the 6th Central Pay Commission and the decision of the Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh Grewal v. Punjab State Electricity Board to support its conclusion. 2. The court held that it had the power to direct the amendment of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007, in order to rectify the anomaly and ensure that the principle of seniority was upheld.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to amend Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007. The court also directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to induct the petitioner into the IPS on his submitting an unconditional willingness in said regards and fix his seniority in the IPS as per the amended Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b).

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. The Indian Police Service (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPS’) is one of the many All India Civil Services. The pay band(s) and grade pay(s) admissible to a member of the IPS are as follows:-

S. No.

Name of Scale

Eligibility Criteria

Scale of Pay

Pay Band

Grade Pay in Rs.

1.

Junior Scale

Initial Appointment

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

5400

2(i)

Senior Scale: (i) Senior Time Scale

Completion of 4 years of Service

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

6600

2(ii)

Senior Scale: (ii) Junior Administrative Grade

Completion of 9 years of Service

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

7600

2(iii)

Senior Scale: (iii) Selection Grade

Completion of 13 years of Service

Rs.37,400-67,000

PB-4

8700

3(i)

Super Time Scale:  (i) Deputy Inspector General of Police

Completion of 14 years of Service

Rs.37,400-67,000

PB-4

8900

3(ii)

Super Time Scale: (ii) Inspector General of Police

Completion of 18 years of Service

Rs.37,400-67,000

PB-4

10000

4(i)

Above Super Time Scale:

-

Rs.67,000 – (annual

-

-

   

 

HAG Scale

 

increment @ 3%) – 79,000

 

 

4(ii)

Above Super Time Scale: HAG+

-

Rs.75,500 – (annual increment @ 3%) – 80,000

-

-

4(iii)

Above Super Time Scale: Apex Scale

-

Rs.80,000 (fixed)

-

-

2. Appointment to the service is by direct recruitment as also promotion/induction of substantive members of State Police Services including the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Police Service (hereinafter referred to as the ‘DANIPS’). Eligibility for appointment by promotion is 8 years of regular service in the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police or any other equivalent post.

3. As is clear from its nomenclature, DANIPS is a law enforcement police force in-charge of Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli. There are following 4 grades in DANIPS:-

S. No.

Grades of the Service

Eligibility Criteria

Scale of Pay

Pay Band

Grade Pay in Rs.

1(a)

Entry Grade (Group B)

Initial Appointment 

Rs.9300-34800

PB-2

4800

1(b)

Entry Grade (Group B)

Completion of 4 years of approved Service

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

5400

2.

Selection Grade (Group A)

Completion of 8 years of approved Service

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

6600

3.

Junior Administrative Grade-II (Group a)

Completion of 13 years of approved Service

Rs.15,600-39,100

PB-3

7600

4.

Junior Administrative Grade-I (Group A)

Completion of 18 years of approved Service

Rs.37,400-67,000

PB-4

8700

6. The Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 deal with the promotion of an officer of a State Police Service including DANIPS to the IPS. Being relevant for our discussion, Regulations 2, 5, 7 and 9 need to be noted. They read as under:-

“2. DEFINITIONS: -

(I) In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires:

(j) State Police Service means:

i) For the purpose of filling up the vacancies in the Indian Police Service cadre of the Arunachal Pradesh-Goa-Mizoram-Union Territories under rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules, any of the following services namely:-

a) The Delhi and Andaman & Nicobar Islands Police Service.

5. PREPARATION OF A LIST OF SUITBALE OFFICERS:-

(1) Each Committee shall ordinarily meet every year and prepare a list of such members of the State Police Service as are held by them to be suitable for promotion to the Service. The number of members of the State Police Service to be included in the list shall be determined by the Central Gov















































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top