DELHI HIGH COURT
Pradeep Nandrajog, Pratibha Rani, JJ.
Raj Kumar Jha - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Resopndent
W.P. (C) 2683/2012 and W.P.(C) 7710 of 2012
Decided On : 22-04-2013
INDIAN POLICE SERVICE - APPOINTMENT BY PROMOTION - FIXATION OF SENIORITY - IPS (REGULATION OF SENIORITY) RULES, 1988 - RULE 3(II)(A) AND (B) - IPS (APPOINTMENT BY PROMOTION) REGULATIONS, 1955 - REGULATION 7(4) - IPS (PAY) RULES, 2007 - RULE 5(3) AND SCHEDULE I - AMENDMENTS - ANOMALY - SENIORITY AND PAY FIXATION - WRIT PETITION - DIRECTIONS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an officer of the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Police Service (DANIPS), challenged the fixation of his seniority upon induction into the Indian Police Service (IPS) as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, which resulted in him being placed below directly recruited IPS officers drawing lower pay scales and grade pay. The petitioner contended that this was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was indeed an anomaly in the application of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, which resulted in officers of the State Police Service being placed below directly recruited IPS officers drawing lower pay scales and grade pay. The court held that this was contrary to the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior, as established in the report of the 6th Central Pay Commission and the decision of the Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh Grewal v. Punjab State Electricity Board.
Issues: 1. Whether the fixation of seniority of the petitioner upon induction into the IPS as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior? 2. Whether the court could direct the amendment of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the fixation of seniority of the petitioner upon induction into the IPS as per Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, was anomalous and violative of the principle that a junior officer cannot draw a higher grade pay than his senior. The court relied on the report of the 6th Central Pay Commission and the decision of the Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh Grewal v. Punjab State Electricity Board to support its conclusion. 2. The court held that it had the power to direct the amendment of Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007, in order to rectify the anomaly and ensure that the principle of seniority was upheld.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to amend Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1988, to bring it in line with the amended provisions of the IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 and IPS (Pay) Rules, 2007. The court also directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to induct the petitioner into the IPS on his submitting an unconditional willingness in said regards and fix his seniority in the IPS as per the amended Rule 3(ii)(a) and (b).
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.
1. The Indian Police Service (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPS’) is one of the many All India Civil Services. The pay band(s) and grade pay(s) admissible to a member of the IPS are as follows:-
S. No.
Name of Scale
Eligibility Criteria
Scale of Pay
Pay Band
Grade Pay in Rs.
1.
Junior Scale
Initial Appointment
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
5400
2(i)
Senior Scale: (i) Senior Time Scale
Completion of 4 years of Service
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
6600
2(ii)
Senior Scale: (ii) Junior Administrative Grade
Completion of 9 years of Service
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
7600
2(iii)
Senior Scale: (iii) Selection Grade
Completion of 13 years of Service
Rs.37,400-67,000
PB-4
8700
3(i)
Super Time Scale: (i) Deputy Inspector General of Police
Completion of 14 years of Service
Rs.37,400-67,000
PB-4
8900
3(ii)
Super Time Scale: (ii) Inspector General of Police
Completion of 18 years of Service
Rs.37,400-67,000
PB-4
10000
4(i)
Above Super Time Scale:
-
Rs.67,000 – (annual
-
-
HAG Scale
increment @ 3%) – 79,000
4(ii)
Above Super Time Scale: HAG+
-
Rs.75,500 – (annual increment @ 3%) – 80,000
-
-
4(iii)
Above Super Time Scale: Apex Scale
-
Rs.80,000 (fixed)
-
-
2. Appointment to the service is by direct recruitment as also promotion/induction of substantive members of State Police Services including the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Police Service (hereinafter referred to as the ‘DANIPS’). Eligibility for appointment by promotion is 8 years of regular service in the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police or any other equivalent post.
3. As is clear from its nomenclature, DANIPS is a law enforcement police force in-charge of Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli. There are following 4 grades in DANIPS:-
S. No.
Grades of the Service
Eligibility Criteria
Scale of Pay
Pay Band
Grade Pay in Rs.
1(a)
Entry Grade (Group B)
Initial Appointment
Rs.9300-34800
PB-2
4800
1(b)
Entry Grade (Group B)
Completion of 4 years of approved Service
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
5400
2.
Selection Grade (Group A)
Completion of 8 years of approved Service
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
6600
3.
Junior Administrative Grade-II (Group a)
Completion of 13 years of approved Service
Rs.15,600-39,100
PB-3
7600
4.
Junior Administrative Grade-I (Group A)
Completion of 18 years of approved Service
Rs.37,400-67,000
PB-4
8700
6. The Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 deal with the promotion of an officer of a State Police Service including DANIPS to the IPS. Being relevant for our discussion, Regulations 2, 5, 7 and 9 need to be noted. They read as under:-
“2. DEFINITIONS: -
(I) In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires:
(j) State Police Service means:
i) For the purpose of filling up the vacancies in the Indian Police Service cadre of the Arunachal Pradesh-Goa-Mizoram-Union Territories under rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules, any of the following services namely:-
a) The Delhi and Andaman & Nicobar Islands Police Service.
5. PREPARATION OF A LIST OF SUITBALE OFFICERS:-
(1) Each Committee shall ordinarily meet every year and prepare a list of such members of the State Police Service as are held by them to be suitable for promotion to the Service. The number of members of the State Police Service to be included in the list shall be determined by the Central Gov
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.