V.K.JAIN
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
V.K. Jain, J.
The only issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether the respondent No.3 was justified in refusing an arm Licence to the petitioner.
2. The petitioner submitted an application dated 11.01.2011 for grant of an arm licence, in order to secure his life, property and business activities. The said application was rejected vide order dated 07.03.2011, on the same ground that the petitioner did not have any specific threat. Being aggrieved from the said decision, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi. The appeal was rejected on the ground that there was no specific threat to the petitioner’s life or liberty, which would justify the grant of an Arms Licence to him. The Lieutenant Governor also took into consideration the report of Additional DCP-I (North-East District), stating therein that the general law and order situation in his area, including village Tahirpur, where the petitioner resides was normal and need for the arm licence, therefore, did not appear to be genuine. Being aggrieved from the said orders, the petitioner is before this Court, seeking setting aside of the order dated 18.01.2012 and a direction to res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.