SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 2293

VEENA BIRBAL
Shakuntala – Appellant
Versus
Shivji – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent: None

JUDGMENT :

Veena Birbal, J.

CRL.M.A. No.13415/2013 (exemption)

Exemption as prayed is allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.A. No.13416/2013 (condonation of delay)

There is a delay of 21 days in refiling the appeal.

In view of the reasoning given, delay in refiling the appeal is condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. No.505/2013

1. The challenge has been made to order dated 15.4.2013 passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Delhi whereby maintenance @ Rs. 3,000/- p.m. has been awarded to the petitioner/wife in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

2. The parties were married to each other on 17.5.1995 at Delhi. After marriage, they lived together as husband and wife. No child is born from their wedlock. Petitioner/wife in her application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. had alleged that she was not treated properly in the matrimonial home and was turned out. Thereafter, on 23.5.2009 she had filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for the grant of maintenance to her. The said petition was contested by the respondent/husband who is living in Bihar and working in Railways. Respondent denied having treated the wife with cruelty as was alleged by













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top