2013 Supreme(Del) 2294
DELHI HIGH COURT
Suresh Kait, J.
Baby Neeta @ Sunita - Appellant
Versus
Miland Kumar & Anr. - Resopndent
MAC.APP. 329/2011
Decided On : 09-09-2013
For the Appellant : Mr. Navneet Goyal , Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R2.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the legal principles set forth in the case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd., for determining just and fair compensation for children suffering disability due to motor vehicle accidents.
Headnote:
Compensation - Personal Injury - The court modified the impugned award based on the legal principles established in the case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd. The appellant was granted enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, medical expenses, and future marriage prospects, in line with the observations made in the Master Mallikarjun case.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant appealed against an award of compensation for a minor girl's personal injury. The appellant argued that the tribunal did not consider all the facts and that the awarded compensation was not proper.
Finding of the Court:
The court modified the impugned award based on the legal principles established in the case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd. The appellant was granted enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, medical expenses, and future marriage prospects, in line with the observations made in the Master Mallikarjun case. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the enhanced compensation amount with the Registrar General of the court.
Issues: The main issue was the determination of just and fair compensation for a child who suffered disability in a motor accident. The court also considered the adequacy of compensation for loss of marriage prospects.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the legal principles established in the case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd., which provided guidelines for determining compensation for children suffering disability due to motor vehicle accidents.
Final Decision: The court allowed the instant appeal, modifying the impugned award and granting enhanced compensation to the appellant for various heads, in accordance with the legal principles established in the Master Mallikarjun case.
Suresh Kait, J.
1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 28.02.2011, whereby, ld. Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs.1,65,606/- as compensation with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of institution of the claim petition, i.e., 13.12.2007 till realization.
2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that ld. Tribunal has not considered the entire facts and the award granted by the ld. Tribunal is not proper.
3. The injured is a minor girl of 11years and the similar issue came before the Supreme Court in a recent decision in a case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd. in Civil No. 1676/2012 decided on 26.08.2013.
4. In the above-noted case, the issue before the Apex Court was as under:
“What is the just and fair compensation to be awarded to a child, who suffered disability in a motor accident, is the main point arising for consideration in this case.”
5. In the above-noted case, the age of the petitioner was 12 years; and the disability was assessed by the Disability Board as 34% and the functional disability has been assessed as 18%. Whereas in the present case the age of the injured was 11 years; the disability was 56% and the ld. Tribunal has assessed 25% functional disability qua the whole body.
6. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the instant case is fully covered by the case of Master Mallikarjun (Supra) and accordingly this court may consider Para 12 of Master Mallikarjun (Supra) wherein the Apex Court has held as under:
“12. Though it is difficult to have an accurate assessment of the compensation in the case of children suffering disability on account of a motor vehicle accident, having regard to the relevant factors, precedents and the approach of various High Courts, we are of the view that the appropriate compensation on all other heads in addition to the actual expenditure for treatment, attendant, etc., should be, if the disability is above 10% and upto 30% to the whole body, Rs.3 lakhs; upto 60%, Rs.4 lakhs; upto 90%, Rs.5 lakhs and above 90%, it should be Rs.6 lakhs. For permanent disability upto 10%, it should be Re.1 lakh, unless there are exceptional circumstances to take different yardstick”
7. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that injured in the present case is a girl and the ld. Tribunal has granted compensation towards loss of marriage prospects as Rs.25,000/-. Therefore, the amount is very meagre and that may be enhanced and alternatively may be maintained.
8. On the other hand, ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/insurance company submits that he does not dispute the law laid down in case of Master Mallikarjun (Supra). Therefore, this court may grant the compensation as per the observation made in Para 12 of the above noted case. He submits that qua the issue on the marriage prospects, there is no discussion in the case of Master Mallikarjun (Supra). He further submits that qua the loss of marriage prospects, ld. Tribunal has granted Rs.25,000/- which is proper and could be maintained.
9. Keeping in view the dictum of the Apex Court in Master Mallikarjun (Supra), the impugned award dated 28.02.2011 is modified qua the other heads, except compensation towards loss of marriage prospects of Rs.25,000/- granted by the ld. Tribunal.
10. Consequently, the appellant is entitled to get the compensation as follows:
HEAD COMPENSATION AMOUNT
Pain and suffering already undergone and to be suffered in future, mental and physical Rs.3,00,000/- shock, hardship, inconvenience, and discomforts, etc. and loss of amenities in life on account of permanent disability. Discomfort, inconvenience and loss of earnings to the parents during the period of hospitalization Rs.25,000/- Medical and incidental expenses Rs.25,000/- Future medical expenses for correction of the mal union of fracture and incidental expenses for such treatment. Rs.25,000/- Future marriage prospects Rs.25,000/-
11. Thus th