SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1791

P.K.BHASIN
Raghunandan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

P.K. Bhasin, J.

By way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners seek quashing of the criminal complaint no.49/10 filed against them and some others under Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954(“the Act of 1954” in short) as well as the order dated 2nd March, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi whereby they were summoned as accused for these offences.

2. The two petitioners were sought to be prosecuted by the Food Adulteration Department on the averment that they were the directors of the Company by the name of M/s RJP Restaurants and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred as “the Company”), which was made the main accused in the complaint for the commission of the offences mentioned above, and as such they were in-charge of the affairs of the Company and so also liable to be punished for those offences. From this averment made in the complaint it is clear that the petitioners were sought to be made liable for the offences allegedly committed by the Company only because of their being its Directors and not bec



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top