MUKTA GUPTA
Irfan Badshah – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Mukta Gupta, J.— (ORAL)
1. At the outset learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that the present petition be treated as a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The present petition is treated as petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Registry to re-number the petition.
3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is limited to the disallowance of two important questions as irrelevant during the cross-examination of PW22 ACP Mahavir Singh, Investigating Officer of case FIR No. 161/2008 registered at PS Amar Colony under Section 302/323/34 IPC. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Petitioner is facing trial in a case of murder and is in judicial custody for a period of over four years. While the Petitioner was cross-examining PW22 he asked two questions to the Investigating officer as to whether it was correct that DD Nos. 9 and 10 were based on the documents Ex. PW12/A and Ex. PW17/A respectively. Both these questions were disallowed by the learned Trial Court as irrelevant. According to the learned counsel both Ex. PW12/A and PW17/A have been ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.