J.R.MIDHA
Surjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
J.R. Midha, J.
Crl. M.A.5018/2013
1. The complainant is seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 15th January, 2013 on the ground that they have violated the undertaking given to this Court on 15th January, 2013.
Factual background
2. The dispute between the parties relate to property bearing No. E-104, Jeevan Park, Uttam Nagar, Delhi which was owned by late Ranjit Singh Jutla who died intestate on 12th July, 2003 at U.K. leaving behind five legal heirs, namely, petitioner No. 1(mother), the complainant(wife), and three sons, namely, Sandeep Jutla, Harpal Jutla and Inderjeet Jutla. Petitioner No. 2 is the daughter of petitioner No. 1.
Probate Case 335/2006
3. On 20th April, 2005, the complainant instituted a petition under Section 278 of Indian Succession Act for grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the estate of her husband late Ranjit Singh Jutla in respect of his movable and immovable estate including property No. E-104, Jeevan Park, Uttam Nagar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the subject property”).
4. Petitioner No. 1 contested the said petition on the ground that she was the owner in possession of subject pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.