Mukta Gupta, J.:--

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 1st October, 2014 whereby Jagdish Chander was permitted to lead additional evidence by the Appellate Court on the issue of ownership of the suit property, Tasleem prefers the present petition.

2. A brief exposition of facts is that Jagdish Chander the respondent/plaintiff herein filed a suit for possession and damages against Tasleem, the defendant/petitioner herein in respect of suit property No. 6612, Neemwala Chock, Nabi Karim, New Delhi stating that Tasleem was inducted as a tenant by father of Jagdish in a single room shop on the ground floor and a room over it on a monthly rent of Rs. 1600/- and Rs. 500/- respectively exclusive of all other charges. After the death of father of Jagdish his mother used to collect the rent. Tasleem is a persistent defaulter and keeps on postponing the payment of rent on one pretext or another. Jagdish being one of the co-owner of the Suit property being the legal heir and successor of late Lachhman Das was thus competent to demand the rent. A demand notice was sent on 6th November, 2001 which was duly served, however in the reply Tasleem denied the landlord-tenant relationship. Tasleem