SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3605

MANMOHAN SINGH
Sanjay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Jitender Verma & Mr. Vishv Nidhi, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State.

JUDGMENT :

Manmohan Singh, J.:--

1. The petitioner has filed the above mentioned application for grant of bail. On the basis of the complaint filed by the complainant Sant Shri Krishna Swami, FIR No. 340/2013 was registered against the petitioner and other accused persons under Sections 420/468/467/471/120-B/34 IPC. The relevant extract of the FIR reads as under:

“I Sant Krishna Swami S/o Pandit Sh. Radha Mohan Mishr R/o A-29/22, Mahendra Park, Azadpur, Delhi and I want to open a Gaushala and School and for that purpose I was searching for a plot and I seen various plot and asked the different persons who are on visiting terms in my Aashra and Amir Chand Buttan, Ajay Buttan, Avinash Sood, were regular visitors to the Ashram of the complainant and the accused Amir Chand Buttan told that he has retired as Director from DDA and he will get him allotted land on minimum rates from DDA within six months and his entire family works in DDA and the LG is also known to him and he can get the plot allotted. He has already got allotted plots to Punjab Kesari, Haldi Ram Bhujia and all big peoples. At present Amir Chand Buttan told the complainant that his son-in-law is Director (Land Allotment) in

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top