SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3744

P.S.TEJI
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondent/ State: Mr. Pramod Saxena, APP.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. Teji, J.:--

1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 15.01.2004 and order on sentence dated 17.01.2004 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- under Section 420 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 419 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs. 3,000/- under Section 468 IPC, in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 471 IPC and upholding the same by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 20.02.2007, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner. However, the learned Additional Sessions Judge modified the sentence by awarding three months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Section 420 IPC and also three months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Sectio






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top