P.S.TEJI
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
P.S. Teji, J.:--
1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 15.01.2004 and order on sentence dated 17.01.2004 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- under Section 420 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 419 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs. 3,000/- under Section 468 IPC, in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 471 IPC and upholding the same by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 20.02.2007, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner. However, the learned Additional Sessions Judge modified the sentence by awarding three months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Section 420 IPC and also three months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Sectio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.