SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3592

HIMA KOHLI
ISHA – Appellant
Versus
Balbir Singh – Respondent


For the Plaintiff :Mr. Prithu Garg and Mr.Virat K.Anand, Advocates.
For the Defendants No. 2 :Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Hima Kohli, J. (Oral):--

IA No. 2793/2014(u/O VIII R 10 CPC)

1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff praying inter alia for pronouncement of judgment against the defendants in view of the fact that they have not filed their written statements within the prescribed period.

2. The plaintiff(daughter-in-law of the defendant No. 1 and sister-in-law of the defendant No. 3) has filed the accompanying suit for passing a decree of possession in her favour in respect of Flat No. 103-B, Pocket-IV, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I, Delhi. The plaintiff has also prayed for a decree of permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from transferring, selling, alienating, or parting with possession of the suit premises and for a decree of recovery of damages @ Rs. 15,000/- per month, payable jointly and severally by the defendants from the date of instituting the present suit, till the date of possession.

3. The present suit was instituted on 25.5.2012. Summons were issued in the suit vide order dated 28.5.2012. On the said, an ad interim ex-parte order was passed in favour of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from creating any third party interest in the suit premises.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top