SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 3212

DELHI HIGH COURT
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
Kusum Rani, Moti Ram - Appellant
Versus
Uma Vati - Resopndent
Rc. Rev. No. 379/2014 & Rc. Rev. No. 381 of 2014
Decided On : 26-11-2014

Advocates:
For the Petitioner in Rc.Rev. No. 379/2014:Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Shiv Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Soumya Kumar, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in Rc.Rev. No. 381/2014:Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Gupta, Advocate.

The bonafide need of the landlord is a key consideration in eviction cases under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

Headnote:

Bonafide Necessity - Eviction - Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) - 11, 17, 18

Fact of the Case:

The landlady filed eviction petitions to open a computer institute and a clinic for her sons and granddaughters. The tenants contested the petitions, claiming the landlady did not have a bonafide need for the premises.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the landlady's sons and granddaughters were well-qualified in computer science and had genuine plans to open a computer training institute and a clinic. The court dismissed the petitions, stating that the landlady's need was bonafide and sincere.

Issues: Dispute over the bonafide need for eviction and the alleged receipt of premium by the landlady.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the landlord's bonafide need is a crucial aspect in eviction cases. It also noted that the alleged premium payment by the tenants was not proven and, even if true, did not disentitle the eviction.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGMENT :

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral):--

1. Both these petitions can be disposed of by this common judgment inasmuch as the impugned judgment of the Rent Controller is same in both the cases. The landlady being the respondent is same in both the cases and the need which has been projected for eviction of the petitioners/tenants is the same viz of opening of a computer institute by both her sons in the entire ground floor of the premises bearing No. 21, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi. There are a total of eight shops with seven tenants inasmuch as one shop is with the respondent/landlady and all the seven tenants are sought to be evicted through separate eviction petitions. Two litigations being the present cases are against two tenants in two shops out of the seven shops. Bonafide necessity eviction petitions were filed because the family of the respondent/landlady being her sons, and grand-daughters etc want to open a computer institute in the entire ground floor of the property. The need is also projected with respect to opening of a clinic for requirement of the grand-daughter who is a doctor.

2(i) The facts of the case are that the respondent/landlady filed the subject eviction petitions with respect to two shops bearing No. 21/4 (RCR No. 379/2014) and 21/2 (RCR No. 381/2014), Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi inasmuch as the elder son of the respondent/landlady Sh. Naveen Prakash was employed as a Director Principal at Manav Rachna College of Engineering, Faridabad and who has done his Ph.D. in computer science from IIT Delhi. Sh. Naveen Prakash therefore has 40 years experience in teaching and research. Sh. Naveen Prakash is due to retire in the year 2015 and Sh. Naveen Prakash after his retirement wants to lead an active academic life and have an economic activity by opening of a computer institute in the entire ground floor including the subject two shops. Respondent’s/landlady’s other son Sh. Ajay Prakash was aged about 57 years and who has done MA (Economics) and has obtained certificate in COBOL programming from IIT Delhi in the year 1977. Sh. Ajay Prakash was working but he left his job in the year 1996 and thereafter started the business of computer maintenance which could not be continued for want of commercial space and therefore he had to close the computer maintenance business and start the work of consultancy in computers. Sh. Ajay Prakash does not want to continue with the business of consultancy in computers because he is not earning much and therefore he wants to join hands with his brother Sh. Naveen Prakash for opening of a computer training institute in the subject properties. With the eviction petitions, the respondent/landlady annexed the entire proposed plan for the computer training institute stating that two rooms were required for lectures, two rooms for laboratory, one room for reception-cum-office, one room as staff room for teachers, separate toilets for boys and girls and one room each for the offices of both the sons who are professors.

(ii) In the eviction petition, it was also stated that Sh. Naveen Prakash’s daughter Ms. Deepika Prakash has completed her M. Tech in Information Technology from IIT, Bangalore and is now pursuing Ph.D from Delhi College of Engineering. She having been specialized in computer science also intends to join her father and assist him in the institute of computer training proposed to be opened in the ground floor seven shops. Ms. Akanksha Prakash, daughter of Mr. Ajay Prakash, has done Bachelor of Computer Application from IP Universtiy and also intends to join her father.

(iii) Ms. Kelika Prakash, the other daughter of Mr. Naveen Prakash, has done MBBS from Maulana Azad Medical College and has also obtained an MD degree. She wants to start her independent medical practice and for which a shop is also required on the ground floor for opening of a clinic.

(iv) The respondent/landlady has thus filed the eviction petitions against all the tenants for the requireme










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top