VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Kusum Rani, Moti Ram – Appellant
Versus
Uma Vati – Respondent
Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral):--
1. Both these petitions can be disposed of by this common judgment inasmuch as the impugned judgment of the Rent Controller is same in both the cases. The landlady being the respondent is same in both the cases and the need which has been projected for eviction of the petitioners/tenants is the same viz of opening of a computer institute by both her sons in the entire ground floor of the premises bearing No. 21, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi. There are a total of eight shops with seven tenants inasmuch as one shop is with the respondent/landlady and all the seven tenants are sought to be evicted through separate eviction petitions. Two litigations being the present cases are against two tenants in two shops out of the seven shops. Bonafide necessity eviction petitions were filed because the family of the respondent/landlady being her sons, and grand-daughters etc want to open a computer institute in the entire ground floor of the property. The need is also projected with respect to opening of a clinic for requirement of the grand-daughter who is a doctor.
2(i) The facts of the case are that the respondent/landlady filed the subject evic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.