SUNITA GUPTA
Santosh Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Dayal – Respondent
Sunita Gupta, J.
1. Challenge in this appeal u/s 378(4) Cr. P.C. is to the judgment of acquittal dated 30.01.2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No. 14114/1 in Complaint case filed u/s 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the Rs. Act’.
2. Before addressing the rival submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, it would be apt to survey the facts leading up to the present litigation. A complaint under Section 138 of the Act was filed by the appellant, inter alia, on the allegations that accused was an intimate and close friend of the family of the complainant and under the influence of friendship, the accused had requested for a friendly loan of Rs. 1 lac somewhere in the beginning of February, 2009. Subsequently, on 13th February, 2009, the complainant had paid Rs. 1 lac in cash as loan to the accused as she was in dire need of funds and was facing financial crisis. In lieu of loan, the accused had issued post dated cheque bearing No. 150731 dated 14th May, 2009 of Rs. 1 lac drawn on SBI in favour of the complainant. The complainant deposited the said cheque after one month from due date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.