SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 3102

DELHI HIGH COURT
Pradeep Nandrajog, Mukta Gupta, JJ.
Subhash Gupta - Appellant
Versus
State - Resopndent
Crl. A. 679/2012
Decided On : 29-09-2014

For the Appellant :Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Misra, Ms. Namita Wali, Advocates.
For the Respondent/State: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the attribution of knowledge to the assailant regarding the dangerous nature of the acts, leading to the commission of the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC.

Headnote:

Section 302 IPC - Offence of murder - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the evidence and legal provisions related to the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing the injuries caused, the severity of the assault, and the attribution of knowledge to the assailant regarding the dangerous nature of the acts.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was accused of attacking and causing the death of his younger brother, leading to a trial for the offence of murder.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant's actions resulted in the severe injuries and death of the victim, and the evidence established the commission of the offence of murder.

Issues: The key issue was whether the appellant's actions constituted the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC or 304 Part I IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence of the victim's mother and other witnesses, the post mortem report detailing the severe injuries, and the attribution of knowledge to the assailant regarding the dangerous nature of the acts to establish the commission of the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision regarding the commission of the offence of murder by the appellant.

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

Crl. M.B. No. 10652/2014

1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the limited point which he needs to address is whether the act of the appellant constitutes the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC or 304 Part I IPC. Counsel states that everything turns on the testimony of the mother of the appellant, who is also the mother of the deceased Smt. Ram Dulari PW-1. Counsel states that if appeal itself could be heard today he does not press Crl. M.B.10652/2014 whereunder the appellant seeks bail pending final hearing of the appeal.

2. We have accordingly decided to hear arguments in the appeal today itself.

3. Crl. M.B. No. 10652/2015 is dismissed.

Crl. Appeal No. 679/2012

1. The unfortunate day was July 15, 2008. It was past mid-night. At 1:07 in the dead of the night information was received at P.S. Shahdara and noted in DD No. 2A, Ex.PW-12/A by SI Sumer Singh PW-12, the duty officer at the Police Station, that near Sai Baba Mandir, Kabool Nagar, Shahdara, a quarrel was taking place.

2. The PCR van stationed near where Ram Dulari PW-1, her deceased son Rajinder and the elder son – Subhash resided, reached the spot and removed Rajinder to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital where he was declared brought dead as recorded in the MLC Ex.PW-6/A by Dr. Anshul.

3. The duty officer at the hospital conveyed said information to PS Shahdara where it was recorded in DD No. 3A, Ex.PW-12/B by SI Sumer Singh.

4. ASI Lala Ram PW-13 was entrusted with the investigation and accompanied by HC Ombir Singh he reached house No. 1/6060 Kabool Nagar, near Sai Baba Temple and met Ram Dulari PW-1 who told him that her son had been removed to GTB Hospital. Insp. K.K. Upadhyaya PW-15, the Addl. SHO of the area also reached the spot on learning about the incident. Crime team was summoned. Ram Dulari’s statement Ex.PW-1/A was recorded from the spot and the FIR Ex.PW-12/C for the offence of murder was registered.

5. Ram Dulari has been examined as PW-1. As per her statement Ex.PW-1/A she has deposed in Court that deceased Rajinder was her younger son and accused Subhash was her elder son. Whereas deceased was hardworking and through his earnings the day to day expenses of the house were met, the appellant was lazy, quarrelsome and an alcoholic. On the day of incident i.e. July 15, 2008, the appellant returned to take dinner at 10.30 P.M. when her younger son requested him to improve himself and earn something so that family expenses can be met, appellant abused and left and returned after two hours at past 12.00 mid-night. Appellant went to the room where Rajinder was sleeping on the first floor to take a bedding and abused Rajinder. She heard a noise. As she came to the staircase she saw the appellant with a brick in one hand and a stick in the other. He was raining blows on her younger son who was bleeding from the head and mouth. She raised an alarm. One Ashok and one Sohan Lal came. Appellant ran away. Her son was removed to GTB Hospital where he died.

6. Sohan Lal has appeared as PW-2 who corroborated PW-1 in all material respect but turned hostile when it came to naming the appellant. Ashok Kumar PW-4 has fully corroborated PW-1 in that has deposed that when he heard a noise of quarrel from the house of PW-1 he reached there and saw appellant running away from the house. Ram Dulari was screaming saying that appellant had injured her younger son Rajinder.

7. There is sufficient evidence to establish that the appellant had attacked his younger brother and the injuries inflicted by the appellant were the cause of Rajinder’s death.

8. The post mortem report Ex.PW-8/A of Rajinder which was authored by Dr. Sumit Tellewar records the undernoted 16 injuries:-

“(1) Reddish graze abrasion measuring 1 cm x 1 cm present on the lateral malleolus of right leg.

(2) Reddish graze abrasion 2 cm x 2 cm present on left posterior aspect of arm 7 cm below above elbow joint.

(3) Reddish graze abrasion 1 cm x 1.2 cm present over the left posterior forearm 2




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top