SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3607

KAILASH GAMBHIR, I.S.MEHTA
Chandan – Appellant
Versus
Dipti – Respondent


For the Appellant :Ms. Mukti Singh and Mr. Sunil Kumar Sinha, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT :

Kailash Gambhir, J.

1. This is an appeal by the appellant-husband under section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 calling in question the tenability of the judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed by the learned District and Principal Judge, South-West District, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi, whereby a joint petition filed by the parties under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce by mutual consent has been dismissed.

2. The grievance raised by the appellant in the instant appeal is that the respondent wife had agreed to file the joint divorce petition after having fully gone through the contents of the same and only after prolonged and detailed talks between the parties but thereafter failed to present herself before the Family Court to give her statement. The learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the disputes between the parties were settled with the intervention of the Vasant Vihar Police Station, where the appellant – husband had returned all the gift items to the respondent – wife and besides that, he had paid a sum of Rs. 5.5 lacs to the respondent. The learned counsel for the appellant thus subm





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top