SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 3560

DELHI HIGH COURT
Mukta Gupta, J.
Randeep Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Ayush Sibal - Resopndent
CM(M) 1126 of 2014
Decided On : 09-01-2015

For the Petitioner:Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Ms. Sadhana Somvanshi and Mr. Atul Patni, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None.

The judgment establishes the need for infrastructure for electronic mail service in subordinate courts and provides an alternative method for serving summons via e-mail in compliance with the Delhi Courts Service of Process Rules, 2010.

Headnote:

Service of Summons - Electronic Mail Service - Delhi Courts Service of Process Rules, 2010

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to serve summons to the respondent via e-mail/SMS/telephone as no physical service was possible. The trial court rejected the application due to lack of affidavit stating the e-mail address of the defendant.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Centralised Computer Committee to provide necessary infrastructure for electronic mail service in subordinate courts. Alternatively, the petitioner could serve the respondent through e-mail by filing the e-mail address along with an affidavit and filing a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act.

Issues: Service of summons via electronic mail, requirement of affidavit for e-mail service, infrastructure for electronic mail service in subordinate courts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for infrastructure for electronic mail service in subordinate courts and provided an alternative method for serving summons via e-mail in compliance with the Delhi Courts Service of Process Rules, 2010.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with directions to the Centralised Computer Committee and the Registrar General for necessary infrastructure and implementation of the Rules.

JUDGMENT :

1. No notice is required to be issued to the respondent for disposal of the present petition as the issue in the present petition relates to service of summons to the respondent before the learned Trial Court. Since no service was being affected to the respondent the petitioner filed an application under Order 5 Rule 9, CPC for service to the respondent by e-mail/SMS/telephone.

2. The learned Trial Court rejected the said application on the ground that no affidavit had been filed by the plaintiff stating the e-mail address of the defendant and as per Chapter 4 Rule 12 of notification relied upon by the petitioner the affidavit in the aforesaid terms was a must before service. It is further noted that under Rule 13 electronic mail service can be effected through digitally signed process by using a pre-designed template along with the scanned images of the document. As per the available infrastructure at Karkardooma Court the same was not possible.

3. The Delhi High Court vide notification dated 9th February, 2011 notified the Delhi Courts Service of Process by Courier, Fax and Electronic Mail Service (Civil Proceeding Rules) 2010 (in short the Rules). As per Chapter 4 Rule 12 of the said Rules a party desirous of sending process to the other party by electronic mail service was required to file e-mail address of the other party along with an affidavit in Court stating that the e-mail address of the other party given by him is correct to the best of his knowledge.

4. The grievance of the learned Trial Court appears to be that no digitally signed process can possibly be sent at the given e-mail address/by using pre-designed template in view of unavailability of infrastructure.

5. The Centralised Computer Committee for the subordinate Courts is directed to look into the matter and provide the necessary infrastructure in this regard in all the Subordinate Courts.

6. In case the said infrastructure is not easily available, on filing of the e-mail address along with his affidavit by the petitioner as contemplated under Chapter 4 Rule 12 of the Rules, the petitioner will serve the respondent through e-mail and file a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act in this regard.

7. Petition is disposed of.

Copy of the order be sent to the Chairman, Central Computer Committee for the Subordinate Courts and also the Registrar General of this Court for circulation to all the District Judges for ensuring necessary infrastructure for implementation of the Delhi Courts Service of Processes by Courier, Fax and Electronic Mail Service (Civil Proceedings) Rules, 2010.

Petition disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top