SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 4175

DELHI HIGH COURT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
TRR Institute of Medical Sciences - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Anr. - Resopndent
W.P.(C) 7671/2015 & CM No. 14973/2015 (for directions)
Decided On : 16-09-2015

For the Petitioner:Mr. J.S. Bhasin with Ms. Rashmi Priya & Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Advocates.
For the Respondent No. 1:Mr. A.P. Sahay, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Biakthansangi & Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates.

The timing of compliance with infrastructure and faculty requirements for the establishment of a new medical college is crucial, and misrepresentation at the time of application can lead to dismissal of the petition.

Headnote:

Medical College - Establishment of New Medical College - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 10-A(4), Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 - [Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 10-A(4), Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought approval for the establishment of a new medical college with an intake capacity of 150 seats for the academic year 2015-2016. The Medical Council of India (MCI) found significant deficiencies during surprise inspections, leading to disapproval of the scheme by both MCI and the Union of India (UOI). The petitioner argued that the deficiencies had been rectified and requested permission for admissions or the option to provide an undertaking.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner had misrepresented its faculty and infrastructure at the time of application, as revealed by subsequent inspections. The court also noted that the MCI Act and the Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 require the medical college to have the necessary infrastructure and faculty at the time of application.

Issues: Disapproval of the scheme for establishing a new medical college, rectification of deficiencies, misrepresentation by the petitioner, and the timing of compliance with infrastructure and faculty requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's misrepresentation and subsequent inspections revealing deficiencies warranted the dismissal of the petition. Additionally, compliance with infrastructure and faculty requirements is necessary at the time of application, not at a later stage.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed with no costs.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petition impugns, (i) the decision dated 29th April, 2015 of the Executive Committee of the respondent No. 2 Medical Council of India (MCI) for disapproval of the scheme submitted by the petitioner for establishment of a new medical college with an intake capacity of 150 seats for MBBS course at Patancheru, Medak, District-Telangana, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh for the academic year 2015-2016; (ii) the communication dated 15th June, 2015 of the respondent No. 1 Union of India (UOI) to the petitioner, disapproving the scheme submitted by the petitioner for establishment of the medical college and (iii) seeks a mandamus to the UOI to grant letter of permission to the petitioner for starting of a New Medical College with 150 admission capacity in MBBS course for the current academic year 2015-2016.

2. The petition came up before this Court first on 12th August, 2015 when it was the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that the controversy, as entailed in the present petition, was the same as in W.P. (C) No. 6529/2015 titled Rajshree Educatonal Trust v. Union of India in which hearing had been concluded on 5th August, 2015 and judgment had been reserved. In view of the said contention, with the consent of the counsels, hearing in this petition was concluded on the same day and judgment reserved to be pronounced along with judgment in W.P. (C) No. 6529/2015. The counsel for MCI has however thereafter handed over written submissions also.

3. I have vide detailed judgment pronounced today, dismissed the writ petition of Rajshree Educatonal Trust supra. Though in the light thereof, this petition is also to be dismissed but it is deemed appropriate to set out the factual position herein.

4. In pursuance to the application dated 28th August, 2014 of the petitioner for starting a medical college with annual intake capacity of 150 admissions in MBBS course for the academic year 2015-2016, a surprise inspection of the petitioner medical college was carried out on 29th & 30th December, 2014 and in which the following deficiencies were found:

“1. Deficiency of faculty is 85% as detailed in report.

2. Shortage of Residents is more than 90% as detailed in report.

3. Bed occupancy is only 6.7%.

4. Wards: Infrastructure is available but yet to start functioning.

5. No OPD patient was found.

6. No operative work was carried out on day of assessment.

7. No Radiological or Laboratory investigations were carried out on day of assessment.

8. ICUs: There was no patient in any ICCU or ICUs on day of assessment.

9. Principal, Dr. K.K. Dave was on leave on day of assessment.

10. No Nursing staff was available on day of assessment.

11. Only 10 paramedical staff were available against requirement of 112 on day of assessment.

12. Hospital authorities have given average OPD attendance of more than 600 & bed occupancy approximately 70% for 3 randomly selected days but no such evidence was produced in MRD/any other record to justify them.

13. Both college & hospital were closed as the management had declared vacation from 22/12/2014 to 01/10/2015. Closure of the hospital due to vacation is not permitted and justified.

14. Other deficiencies as pointed out in the assessment report.”

5. It is the case of the petitioner that it is a Christian Minority Institution established by St. Augustin Educational Society and had declared holidays from 22nd December, 2014 to 1st January, 2015 in view of Christmas/New Year.

6. Needless to state that the Executive Committee of the MCI decided to recommend to UOI not to issue letter of permission for establishment of the new medical college for the academic year 2015-2016 to the petitioner. The said decision was communicated to the UOI vide letter dated 12th January, 2015.

7. It is the case of the petitioner that Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, on the report of the Local Enquiry Committee issued a consent of affiliation dated 24th January, 2015 in favour of the petitioner valid for a period of two






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top