INDERMEET KAUR
Prem Kumar Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Ambrish Garg – Respondent
Indermeet Kaur, J.:--
1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff Prem Kumar Bansal seeking specific performance of para 15 of the agreement to sell dated 18.02.2005 in respect of property bearing No. E-27, Kalindi Colony, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “suit property”). The other reliefs are for mandatory and permanent injunction.
2. The case set up by the plaintiff is that on 18.02.2005, the plaintiff and the sole defendant (Ambrish Garg) had entered into an agreement to sell whereby the defendant had agreed to sell the entire ground floor of the aforenoted suit property with a right to construct the basement for which a sale deed was to be executed at a later date. In terms of this agreement, it was agreed that the parties will jointly demolish this property and reconstruction will be raised upon it in a period not exceeding five years. The basement and ground floor would fall to the share of the plaintiff and the first and second floor would fall to the share of the defendant. The garage, drive way, passage and the terrace floor would be common for both the parties. The consideration of the agreement was Rs. 27 lacs which was paid by the plaintiff to the
Ahmadsahab Abdul Mulla (2) (dead) by proposed LRs. v. Bibijan and Others
Bal Krishan and Another v. Bhagwan Das (dead)
Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v. Savjibhai Haribhai Patel & Others
Saradamani Kandappan Vs.S. Rajalakshmi and Others
Shamsu Suhara Beevi v. G. Alex and Another
Van Vibhag Karamchari Griha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Ramesh Chander and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.