KAILASH GAMBHIR, P.S.TEJI
Soumitra Kumar Nahar – Appellant
Versus
Parul Nahar – Respondent
Kailash Gambhir, J.:--
1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant has questioned the tenability of the order dated 21st March, 2013 passed by the learned Family Court, Saket, whereby the learned Family Court has declined his request for grant of visitation rights to meet his children and the appellant prays for the grant of visitation rights in terms of the consent order dated 1st March, 2013.
2. The brief facts of the case at hand are as follows, that the appellant and the respondent got married on 10.12.2001 at New Delhi according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. That the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was a love marriage. That the minor children Sanjana and Shravan were born out of the wed lock on 24.05.2005 and 10.10.2008 respectively. Due to disharmony between the appellant and the respondent, their marriage culminated in a divorce. That with the ongoing divorce proceedings, the appellant filed an application for visitation rights, which, as per the order dated March 01, 2013 was granted by the Division Bench of this court in FAO (OS) 129/2013 wherein both the parties arrived at certain mutual terms in order to settle the matter. One of the terms
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.