SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 4473

DELHI HIGH COURT
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
Sunny (Minor) & Anr. - Appellant
Versus
Raj Singh & Ors. - Resopndent
CS(OS) No. 431/2006
Decided On : 17-11-2015

For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Mr. Rajesh Chettri and Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.N. Kalra and Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Advocates.

Headnote:

Partition - Rendition of accounts - HUF properties - Denial of - Suit for partition and rendition of accounts - Plaintiffs were minors when the suit was filed and now they are majors - Suit was filed by the plaintiffs through their mother and natural guardian - There are four defendants - Plaintiffs is denied by the defendants - Amended memo of parties for denying the case of the plaintiffs - An HUF could only have been created by showing creation of HUF after 1956 by throwing property/properties in common hotchpotch or existing prior to 1956 - Once there is no pleading or evidence on these aspects - Plaintiffs have miserably failed to discharge the onus of proof - Existence of HUF before 1956 has not been proved by plaintiff - Plaintiffs have failed to prove that HUF was created after 1956 - There is no HUF - There are no properties of HUF in which late Sh. Harvinder had a share - Defendant no.3 has denied any family settlement - Plaintiffs have failed to prove issue nos.1 and 2 - Both the issues are decided in favour of the defendants - Held, plaintiffs are not entitled to the reliefs of partition or rendition of accounts - Suit is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.:--

1. The subject suit is a suit for partition and rendition of accounts. There are two plaintiffs in the suit, and who are the sons of late Sh. Harvinder Sejwal. Plaintiffs were minors when the suit was filed and now they are majors. The suit originally was filed by the plaintiffs through their mother and natural guardian Smt. Poonam, wife of late Sh. Harvinder Sejwal. In the suit there are four defendants. Defendant No. 1 Sh. Gugan Singh is the father of late Sh. Harvinder Sejwal i.e father-in-law of Smt. Poonam, the mother of the plaintiffs. Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 are the other three sons of defendant No. 1 i.e three brothers of late Sh. Harvinder Sejwal, the husband of Smt. Poonam. By the suit, relief of partition is sought with respect to properties mentioned in Annexure A to the plaint. Though this Annexure A to the plaint does not exist, this Annexure A as per the copy shown to this Court contains the properties which are mentioned in para 15 of the plaint. The properties which are mentioned in para 15 of the plaint read as under:-

“15. That the subject matter of the present suit are the following moveable and immovable properties which belong to the Joint Hindu Family property being ancestral in nature, the details of which as per the knowledge of the plaintiffs are as under:

(i) Immoveable Properties:

(a) 113/B-1, Front, Adhichini, Hauz Khas, New Delhi

(b) 58, Village: Adhichini, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi

(c) 200 sq. yd. Plot in Ber Sarai Extension, New Delhi

(d) 4 shops in Adarshani Plaza, Adhichini, New Delhi

(e) 4 Flats in Adarshini Plaza, 93, Adhichini, New Delhi

(f) Landed/Agricultural properties in Village: Badarpur, Ballabgarh, Faridabad,

(g) Landed/Agricultural Properties in Kotputli, Rajasthan.

(h) 258, Manglapuri Extension, M.G. Road, New Delhi

(ii) Vehicles:

(a) Two Buses - Plying between Kotputilli and Bharatpur, Blue Line - contract carriage.

(b) Tempo.

(iii) Personnel belongings

(a) Bank Account in Allahabad Bank, Adhichini, New Delhi and

(b) Bank Account, Punjab National Bank, Mehrauli, New Delhi.

2. The case of the plaintiffs as per the plaint is that the defendant No. 1 owned ancestral land being plot No. 93 situated in Village Adhichini, Hauz Khas, New Delhi and this property was sold out on collaboration basis and the properties which are the subject matter of the suit were purchased from the funds generated out of the said sale of the property No. 93, Village Adhichini, Hauz Khas. In the property No. 93, a commercial complex was constructed and in which as per the plaint, the family received four shops and four flats which are mentioned at serial Nos. (d) and (e) of para 15 of the plaint. Further, as per the plaint, from the funds received from the sale of the property No. 93, Village Adhichini, Hauz Khas, a premises being the premises at serial No. (h) of para 15 of the plaint namely property bearing No. 258, Manglapuri Extension, New Dellhi was purchased and which is situated on an area of approximately 150 sq. yds. wherein the plaintiffs alongwith their mother are living in the ground floor of this property. The first floor is with a tenant Sh. Rajendra Jha. Plaintiffs plead that there was a family settlement between the parties as per which the father of the plaintiffs Sh. Harvinder Sejwal got the house No. 258, Manglapuri Extension, New Delhi besides one shop on the ground floor in Adarshini Plaza, Adhichini and a flat No. 93 in Village Adhichini, Hauz Khas, New Delhi. Plaintiffs’ father expired on 12.11.2004 and plaintiffs therefore plead to be owners of the properties falling to the share of their father out of the joint properties mentioned in para 15 of the plaint. Plaintiffs claim ownership of 1/5th share in the suit properties.

3. Defendants have contested the suit by filing a common written statement. Defendants have denied that the suit properties were/are Joint Hindu Undivided Family properties/HUF properties. Defendants have also denied that any family settlement as allege



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top