P.S. TEJI, J.

1. By the aforesaid two separate revision petitions filed under Section 397/401 read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of conviction dated 19.09.2015 and 24.09.2015 respectively, passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, against which the petitioner also preferred two separate appeals being Appeal Nos. 42 and 43 of 2015 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02/FTC, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, Delhi and in consequence thereto, the learned Additional Sessions Judge had dismissed the appeals vide order dated 16.12.2015, upholding the judgment and order on sentence passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate.

2. Since both the revision petitions arise out of a common order and judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge as well as learned Metropolitan Magistrate, therefore both the petitions are heard together and are being disposed of together.

3. In nutshell, the brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had asked friendly loan of Rs.5 lacs in the month of August 2010 but the respondent No.2/Complainant somehow could arrange only Rs.3,80,000/-and paid the same through five separate cheques.