SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 1293

SANJIV KHANNA, ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narender Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate
Mr. Satyakam, ASC for respondent Nos.2 to 5

JUDGMENT :

Sanjiv Khanna, J.

These two writ petitions by Surender Singh and Rajinder Kumar impugn a common order dated 3.5.2011 passed in OA No. 699/2011 filed by Narendra Kumar, the first respondent before us.

2. The first respondent was appointed as Sub-Inspector (Operations) in Delhi Police on 20.8.2004 as a direct recruit.

3. The Commissioner of Police had called for service records of the first respondent and the two petitioners for promotion to the post of Motor Transport Inspector (MT Inspector for short). The first respondent had objected. The contention was that, as per the Recruitment Rules (“RRs”), the two petitioners were not eligible and he was the only eligible candidate who could be considered for promotion to the post of MT Inspector.

4. The impugned order dated 3.5.2011 passed by the Tribunal has held that the petitioners were then not eligible for consideration for promotion to the post of MT Inspector, and the Commissioner of Police was directed to consider the first respondent for the said post on merits. The Tribunal, while passing the impugned order, has quas

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top