SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2022

MUKTA GUPTA
VIKAS KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Adv. DHCLSC.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State.

JUDGMENT :

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. By the instant appeal the appellant Vikas Kumar challenges the impugned judgment dated 28th February, 2013 whereby he has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366 IPC and the order on sentence dated 8th March, 2013 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four years for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC along with a fine of Rs.3,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three months and Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Section 366 IPC with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of which he shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 21st May, 2012 at 4.05 PM the complainant informed that her granddaughter aged 14½ years resident of House No.623, K-Block, Jahangir Puri, height 5 ft, fair complexion, round face, slim body, wearing cream colour top and black pant, whose upper front teeth was broken, was missing from her house since 4.00 A.M. She has been enticed by some unknown person and taken to some unknown place. On the basis of this statement, FIR






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top