SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 1517

S.RAVINDRA BHAT, DEEPA SHARMA
SANJAY BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Ms. Komudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha and Ms. Shreya Kasera, Advocates for petitioner.
Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. Sunil and Mr. N. Jagdish, Advocates for petitioners.
Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate for respondents with Mr. Ashok Kumar, Asst. Registrar.
Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Standing Counsel (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Astha Nigam, Advocate for Resp-1/RCS.
Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Ms. Komudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha and Ms. Shreya Kasera, Advocates for petitioner.
Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. Sunil and Mr. N. Jagdish, Advocates for petitioners.
Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate for respondents with Mr. Ashok Kumar, Asst. Registrar.
Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Standing Counsel (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Astha Nigam, Advocate for Resp-1/RCS.

JUDGMENT :

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. These two writ petitions urged common grievances. The petitioner in W.P.(C) 3641/2014 is a member of the Belur Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (respondent in the proceedings). The petitioner in W.P.(C) 2908/2014 is a member of the Chinar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd.

2. The facts in both cases are brief; criminal proceedings were initiated against both petitioners - who are members of the respective Cooperative Group Housing Societies. Consequent upon investigation, in the case of Sanjay Bajaj, member of Chinar Cooperative Group Housing Society, charges were framed; however, the criminal proceedings were stayed by the Supreme Court. In the case of Gopal Bansal, the petitioner, a member of the Belur Cooperative Group Housing Society, charges have not yet been made. Their grievance is that the Registrar of Cooperative Society (“RCS”) has refused to process and forward their names for consideration and eventually allotment of a flat constructed by it, to the DDA. The RCS relies upon the policy/decision of the Lieutenant Governor (“LG”) in respect of 26 Societies dated 17.10.2011. The same is extracted below: -

"However the member and
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top