SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2025

P.S.TEJI
SANJAY SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Adv.
Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP Mr. Ajay Kumar Arora, Adv. for R-2.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Sanjay Singhal for quashing of FIR No.186/2009 dated 23.12.2009, under Sections 406/420/468/471/34 IPC registered at Police Station Karol Bagh on the basis of the settlement agreement arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi between the petitioner and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Renu Singhal on 16.05.2015.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by her counsel.

3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the FIR in question was lodged by the complainant on the allegation that somebody forged the letter of resignation dated 24.10.2007 of the complainant and thus, the complainant lodged the FIR in question against M/s SFS Infinite Ltd. and all its Directors, namely, Mr. Shiam Sunder Singhal, Mr. Sanjay Singhal, Mr. Atul Mittal, Mr. Munish Kakara and Mr. Rajender Kumar Goel. The complainant alleged that one motive of her fraudulent removal could be the elevation of Mr. Sanjay Singhal























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top