SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2135

P.S.TEJI
HARBIR LAKRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A. Kampani, Adv.
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State Respondent no.2 in person.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Harbir Lakra, Sh. Sukhbir Singh and Smt. Birmati for quashing of FIR No.127/2012 dated 29.06.2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Mundka on the basis of the Memorandum of Settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Ujjwal Dahiya on 21.01.2016 at Delhi.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by her counsel.

3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 was solemnized on 10.12.2006. The complainant gave birth to a female child on 11.02.2010. Since the last two years, the husband of the complainant has been constantly harassing her physically and mentally. The husband of the complainant left his job in July 2010 and has been sitting at home idle since then. The husband of the complainant used to demand dowry of Rs. 50 lakhs from her. The complainant worked as a tutor and used to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top