SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

FAO(OS) 402/2015 & CM Nos. 23228/2015 (correction in the statement of counsel for the appellants), 31160/2015(directions)

1. This is a classic case of greed over-shadowing relationship. One brother (the appellant No. 1) is trying to take the advantage of his situation and deprive the other brothers and their family of their rights to the property left behind by their father. Attempts are being made to prolong litigation by one means or the other. Not only is the brother attempting to prolong litigation himself but is also using his son to do so. Attempts have been made not only by way of vague and false averments made in applications but also by resiling from statements recorded before this Court.

2. The appeal impugns order dated 15.07.2015, which order was passed in furtherance to order dated 29.05.2015, whereby it was directed that the appellants and their family members shall not obstruct the children of the family/extended family residing in different portions of the suit premises from visiting/playing in the garden in the front portion of the suit premises and it was further directed that the locks pose an obstruction to free access to children to