SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 1911

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Sanjay Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Vasu Tech Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Seth, Advocate
Mr. Saksham Marwah, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.

I.A. No. 6165/2010 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC for grant of leave to defend)

1. This application for leave to defend is filed by the defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). There are a total of four defendants in the suit. Defendant no.1/company is under liquidation, and therefore, counsel for the plaintiff does not press the suit against defendant no.1 but seeks and is granted liberty to file appropriate claims before the official liquidator, and accordingly, the suit will stand disposed of giving the aforesaid liberty to the plaintiff as regards the defendant no.1. Counsel for the plaintiff also prays for deletion of defendant nos. 3 and 4 from the array of defendants as no decree is sought against these defendants. Ordered accordingly. The leave to defend application is therefore to be decided with respect to the rights of the plaintiff in this Order XXXVII suit as regards the defendant no.2, and which defendant no.2 as per the plaintiff was the dramatis personae with respect to the entire trans






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top