SUNITA GUPTA, J.

1. It is stated that human lust knows no bounds-if there is any truth in it, the present case is a glaring example of such lust. In the present case a tiny tot aged about 2-1/2 years has become a victim of the lust of the appellant resulting in his conviction under sections 376(2)(f)/363/186/332/353 IPC in Sessions Case No. 85/2011 arising out of FIR No.29/10 PS Govind Puri and sentenced to undergo various prison terms.

2. Succinctly stated, the case of the prosecution is as follows:

Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet is that on 01.02.2010 at about 08.00 P.M. the appellant after kidnapping the prosecutrix ‘X’ (assumed name), a minor child, aged about 2 years sexually assaulted her. Police machinery came into motion when information about the incident was recorded vide Daily Diary (DD) No.20A at PS Govind Puri. The investigation was assigned to SI Ashok Giri who went to the spot. First Information was lodged on the statement of victim's mother - Ruby. She disclosed as to how and under what circumstances, 'X', her daughter was sexually assaulted by the appellant. During investigation, statements of the witnesses conversant w