SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2167

S.MURALIDHAR, VIBHU BAKHRU
BAJRANG FABRICS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vasdev Lalwani and Mr. Rohit Gautam, Advocates.
Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate.

ORDER :

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

1. These are fourteen petitions filed by a dealer registered under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004 (DVAT Act) challenging the default notices of assessment of tax and interest dated 7th September 2015 under Section 32 of the DVAT Act passed by the Value Added Tax Officer (VATO) for various quarters of the year 2013-14 and 2014-15 and default notices of assessment of penalty of the same date under Section 33 of the DVAT Act. The Petitioner also challenges the corresponding notices dated 11th August 2015 issued to the Petitioner under Section 59 (2) of the DVAT Act as being contrary to both the DVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act).

2. The Petitioner is functioning in the jurisdiction of the Assistant Commissioner VAT/Assessing Authority Ward No. 70 and is holding a TIN number. It is engaged in the business of trading in all kinds of fabric including imported fabrics. The Petitioner is also undertaking inter-state sales. It is, therefore, also registered under the CST Act since November 2011. The Petitioner states that it has been regularly fil






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top