SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2183

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. J.M. Kalia, Adv.
Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Adv. Amicus Curiae.

ORDER :

1. On 2nd May, 2016 when this reference first came up before this Bench the following order was passed:-

“1. This is a reference by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (CCRA), Delhi under Section 57 of the Stamp Act, 1899 posing the following question:

“Whether the notification no.13 of 25-12-1937 extending benefit of remission in stamp duty in case of subsidiary companies as applicable in the then province of Delhi has any continuous validity and applicability in view of notification no. GSR 894 dated 30.09.1958 by which the central government extended the Indian Stamp (Punjab Amendment) Act, 1958 replacing the previous and then prevalent stamp law in union territory of Delhi w.e.f. 01-10-1958.”

2. No Roster having been designated for such reference, The matter upon filing has been specially marked.

3. Section 57 of the Act is as under:

“57. Statement of case by Chief Controlling Revenue-Authority to High Court:-

(1) The Chief Controlling Revenue-Authority may state any case referred to it under Section 56, sub-section (2), or otherwise coming to its notice, and refer such case, with its own opinion thereon,-

(a) if it arises in a State- to the High Court for that State;










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top