SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 4510

HIMA KOHLI
Gunjan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vipin Parwanda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :M. Dutta, Advocate.
For the Appellant :Mukesh Kaushik, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Hima Kohli, J.

The present Chamber Appeal has been filed by Ms. Sonia Grover(daughter of the defendants No.1 and 2) against the order dated 02.09.2014, passed by the Joint Registrar, whereby the impleadment application filed by her was dismissed (I.A. 8628/2014).

2. A brief background of the case is necessary.

3. The plaintiff has instituted the accompanying suit for possession and injunction against the defendants (parents of the applicant) in respect of the ground floor of premises No.A-139, Kalkaji Extension, Delhi. The plaintiff's case is that the defendants No.1 and 2 had represented themselves to be the co-owners of the suit premises. As per the averments made in the plaint, the parties had entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 01.11.2009, in respect of the suit premises, where under the plaintiff had agreed to purchase the same for a sale consideration of Rs. 22,50,000/-. Thereafter, the sale deed was executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises and on the said date, after adjusting the earnest money of Rs. 12,50,000/- paid by the plaintiff, the balance sum of Rs. 10 lacs was also received by the defendants.

4. It is the case














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top